Nearby believe Google’s Duplicate Articles Filter exists, I have Spectacular Proof their Internet articles filter exists and it’s quite effective.
On Come july 1st 5, 2005 I released an article entitled “7 Best Ways to Avoid Link Theft” which was picked up and incorporated as content on some other websites.
Prior to the article was released I examined on Google whether any results currently existed for the exact term “7 Top Ways to Prevent Link Theft” and there have been no listings for that expression.
Over the following few weeks I monitored via a search query on Google the number of results appeared in Google for that title of my content. One week after publication there have been 6, 760 results classified by Google, a week later it had been 14, 100 and it attained a peak of seventeen, 000 results by Come july 1st 26, 2005.
4 weeks after publication the outcomes in Google had fallen somewhat to 16, 600.
Almost 6 several weeks after publication the results classified by Google had fallen in order to 44.
Within less than two weeks the number of search engine results on Google. com for the name of my article choose to go from 16, 600 in order to 44.
Few months latter google started certification service using exams, and you can look at – adwords fundamentals exam answers if you want to pass them easy.
In the event you’re thinking this is because each one of these other websites dropped simply by article and replaced this with other content I should include that a search on Yahoo. possuindo on the same day still demonstrated 14, 300 results regarding my article.
What’s more of these 44 outcomes on Google, more than half consist of entries from the same websites. Put simply some sites have the exact same article duplicated on various pages on their website.
So Google’s Web Content Filter is not utilized to remove duplicate listings in the preferred websites it selects to keep in the search results.
On August 28th, 2005 8 weeks after initial publication I distributed the content again to a new listing of article sites to do the process again. After 6 weeks exactly the same article had reached the peak of 5, 620 results on Google. Less than 14 days later the results had dropped to 217.
For me this was dramatic evidence that Google’s Duplicate Web Content Filter is energetic and very effective. If you’re asking yourself if other major search engines possess a duplicate content filter I could confirm that Yahoo certainly will. The same article which was as soon as listed on 14, three hundred sites on Yahoo, provides fallen to 344 on the same time period.
From these results it would seem Search engines takes about 6 to 8 days to remove duplicate content having a Duplicate Internet Content Filtration system.
But the query remaining is just how does Search engines decide which out of over sixteen, 000 results does it maintain and which does it deny?
I have observed situations where my own content appear in results on some other websites, but are not classified by the results for my own site.
So obviously Google does not take into account who else the originator and writer of the original article had been when deciding which websites will remain in its search results.
It also seems to have absolutely nothing to do with where Google 1st finds the article.
Some articles I have released to my website for several days before releasing them with regard to distribution to other websites.
In that time the particular Google spiders have went to my site several times plus Google has had enough time to exercise that the article was first available on my site.
It would be interesting to see whether it’s possible to work out what elements Google is using in its Web Content Filter to decide which usually results to keep in its list and which ones to remove. Yet that’s for another article.